She was an ally to Harry on that devastating day but his father and brother decided discussions would take place without him. Mr Hardman wrote in the book, serialised by Mail Online: “That evening, the couple would be joined for dinner by the new Prince of Wales, who would also stay at Birkhall. The King needed to have vital but discreet discussions with his elder son In years gone by, such a moment would automatically have included his younger son, too.
“But not any more. This was clearly not an occasion for an opening up of hearts and minds with Prince Harry, particularly if he was still taking notes for his forthcoming book. Charles III needed a clear head and no distractions.” A member of his staff said: “You have to remember, losing a second parent is a big thing, becoming the senior generation is a big thing and there he was, expected to console the whole country.” Now, as she reportedly gears up for a return, here’s everything we know about her potential gigs. PR expert Laura Perkes exclusively told us that the Duchess could be good at “directing others” so a producer or director role could be ideal for her.
Secondly, the details of Kate’s supposed windfall remain murky. The “special privilege” and £1 billion gift lack specifics, making it impossible to assess their legitimacy. This vagueness allows for unchecked speculation and sensationalized headlines.
It’s worth noting that the relationship between Kate and Meghan has long been a target for tabloid scrutiny. Often, narratives pit the two Duchesses against each other, painting them as rivals in a fabricated competition for public favor and royal standing. This framing ignores the complexities of their individual roles and personalities, reducing them to one-dimensional characters in a contrived drama.
Furthermore, attributing negative emotions like jealousy to Meghan without considering the immense pressure and scrutiny she faces as a woman of color in the British royal family risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Judging her actions and speculating on her private thoughts based on unsubstantiated rumors is unfair and unproductive.
Therefore, approaching this tabloid story with a critical eye is essential. Until credible evidence surfaces, dismissing it as sensationalized speculation is prudent. Focusing on the positive contributions of both Duchesses, Kate’s philanthropic endeavors, and Meghan’s advocacy work, offers a more constructive and respectful approach to understanding their roles within the royal family.
Remember, a healthy dose of skepticism is always valuable when navigating the murky waters of tabloid headlines, especially those involving the intricate world of the British royals.
