Meghan Markle, accompanied by Prince Harry, made a striking appearance during the second day of engagements in Whistler for the Invictus Games one year to go celebration.
However, instead of garnering praise for her fashion sense, Meghan once again found herself under scrutiny for her outfit choices.
Donning a black Hermes puffer jacket, black LeLand skinny jeans, a dark blue scarf, a matching Canadian Artesia beanie, and Kameik boots, Meghan’s ensemble raised eyebrows for all the wrong reasons.
The ex-actress’s ability to make luxury brands like Hermes appear cheap and tacky has not gone unnoticed.
Despite the hefty price tag of approximately $5,000 for the Hermes puffer jacket, Meghan’s styling seemed to diminish its value.
In a surprising turn of events, renowned fashion houses such as Chanel, Givenchy, and Hermes have distanced themselves from any association with Meghan Markle, signaling a significant shift in their marketing strategies.
Reports indicate that Meghan’s attempts at affiliate marketing with luxury brands have been met with rejection, with names like Dior, Hermes, and Cartier declining formal partnerships with her.
This move by the luxury brands to exclude Meghan from their marketing endeavors highlights a growing disconnect between the former actress and the fashion industry elite.
While engaging with competitors and sports coaches at the Invictus Games event, Meghan notably avoided wearing any official Invictus merchandise, a move that has been interpreted as a lack of respect towards the Games.
Her insistence on flaunting high-end designer attire in public, despite the circumstances, has raised questions about her priorities and values.
The Mirror reported that during her trip to Canada, Meghan wore almost £8,000 worth of clothing in just 12 hours, drawing criticism for her extravagant spending habits.
The juxtaposition of Meghan’s lavish lifestyle with the struggles faced by Canadian disabled veterans, who often live below the poverty line, has sparked outrage and accusations of insensitivity.
Furthermore, the Sussexes’ choice to take a private flight to Vancouver for Valentine’s Day has been met with strong disapproval, with critics pointing out the couple’s eco-hypocrisy and excessive use of private jets.
The contrast between Harry and Meghan’s luxury travel preferences and the more modest approach of senior British Royals has fueled ongoing debates about their sense of entitlement and responsibility.
As allegations of using funds from the Invictus Foundation for personal indulgences surface, concerns about the couple’s financial ethics and priorities continue to mount.
Reports suggest that Harry and Meghan have taken multiple private flights in a short period, funded by external sources, raising questions about their commitment to responsible spending and transparency.
In light of these controversies surrounding Meghan Markle’s fashion choices and the Sussexes’ extravagant lifestyle, the focus has shifted from the noble cause of the Invictus Games to the couple’s perceived disregard for financial prudence and humility.
The ongoing scrutiny of their actions underscores the challenges faced by public figures in balancing personal indulgence with social responsibility, prompting reflection on the true essence of royalty in modern society.
